It’s official: Netflix will likely be buying Warner Bros. for the tidy sum of $82.7 billion (an fairness worth of $72.0 billion). In a press launch despatched Friday morning, Netflix touted the deal as bringing collectively “two pioneering leisure companies, combining Netflix’s innovation, world attain and best-in-class streaming service with Warner Bros.’ century-long legacy of world-class storytelling.” The discharge additionally opened with the daring assertion that the “Acquisition Will Strengthen the Leisure Trade.” How true that’s is simply one of many massive questions created by this information.
In making this deal, Netflix is simply choosing up Warner Bros.’s studios and streaming enterprise, which is being cut up off from Discovery and the corporate’s cable channels. Ought to the deal undergo, it can shut in about 12 to 18 months — as we get into beneath, although, that’s not a positive factor. As a result of with any deal of this measurement, so much stays unsure.
Will the Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Truly Occur?
Dwayne Johnson’s Spencer Strasmore reads Senator Elizabeth Warren’s e book on an episode of Ballers (HBO)
Betting towards a serious merger occurring within the twenty first century feels fairly silly. However within the instant aftermath of the Netflix-Warner Bros. announcement, Reuters reports that the deal could obtain Congressional pushback and antitrust evaluate from each Democrats and Republicans, to not point out the U.S. Division of Justice.
Associated Video
Critics of the deal embody Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, who referred to as the it “an anti-monopoly nightmare.” Reuters additionally quoted Republican Senator Mike Lee as saying on X that “rising Netflix’s dominance this manner would imply the tip of the Golden Age of streaming for content material creators and shoppers.” Nevertheless, looking X for these posts now pulls up nothing, suggesting that Lee just lately deleted that put up. Lee leads the Senate antitrust committee.
Additionally protesting the potential deal is a collective of “top industry players” who reached out to members of Congress this week with an open letter. Per Selection, “the communication outlines three areas of nice concern, together with that Netflix may stand to ‘destroy’ the theatrical movie market by escalating or eliminating the period of time Warner Bros. movies would play in theaters earlier than hitting a mixed Netflix-HBO Max streaming platform.” The Writers’ Guild of America additionally protested the deal in a blistering statement:
The world’s largest streaming firm swallowing one in every of its greatest rivals is what antitrust legal guidelines have been designed to forestall. The end result would get rid of jobs, push down wages, worsen circumstances for all leisure employees, increase costs for shoppers, and scale back the amount and variety of content material for all viewers. Trade employees together with the general public are already impacted by only some highly effective corporations sustaining tight management over what shoppers can watch on tv, on streaming, and in theaters. This merger have to be blocked.
Moreover, new Paramount proprietor David Ellison had made an aggressive bid for Warner Bros., and as The Hollywood Reporter observes, Ellison presently has a pleasant relationship with the Trump administration because of strikes like the right-wing makeover of CBS News. Whereas Netflix may need received within the quick time period, Ellison may nonetheless use his connections to dam the deal. Paramount has additionally despatched a message to Warner Bros. that alleged the bidding course of for the studio has been “tilted and unfair” — doubtlessly laying the groundwork for future authorized motion to dam the deal. Lots can nonetheless occur right here.
What Does This Imply for Warner Bros. and Theatrical Distribution?
Christopher Nolan on the 2024 Academy Awards, photograph by Trae Patton / ©A.M.P.A.S.
One of many trade’s greatest issues about this deal is what occurs to Warner Bros.’s theater-first film enterprise. In line with Netflix, it’s simple: “Netflix expects to take care of Warner Bros.’ present operations and construct on its strengths, together with theatrical releases for movies.”
On a name with traders Friday, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said that “We’ve launched about 30 movies into theaters this yr, so it’s not like we’ve got this opposition to films in theaters… My pushback has been largely within the truth of the lengthy, unique home windows, which we don’t actually assume are that consumer-friendly.” Provided that theater chains like AMC and Regal depend on these unique home windows as a key a part of their enterprise mannequin, this might be a serious friction level trying ahead.
Netflix would possibly pay attention to one massive factor: When Warner Bros. did experiment with launch home windows within the instant aftermath of the pandemic, its Project Popcorn program led to the tip of the corporate’s relationship with director Christopher Nolan. The consequence: Nolan made his subsequent film for Common. That film was Oppenheimer, which received the Oscar for Greatest Image — the one prize Netflix has not but been capable of purchase.
How Does This Change the Streaming Sport?
Mates (HBO Max)
Mix Netflix and HBO Max, and the streaming wars change into a battle between FlixMax (or regardless of the hell they find yourself calling it) and Disney’s personal community of platforms, together with Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+. ESPN offers Disney a bonus in the case of the sports activities facet of issues, however for these purely all in favour of scripted content material Disney could discover itself at an obstacle.
Netflix buying Warner Bros. additionally implies that Paramount and Comcast (which owns Peacock) can’t have it — and for each of these corporations, it means shedding out on having sufficient content material to compete with Netflix. This might imply a future sale for Peacock, given the service’s lack of scale and worldwide presence. And different smaller streamers, even Prime Video, all change into boutique providers by comparability.
As you may see from the above, there are nonetheless a variety of issues to be sorted out, together with, finally, whether or not this deal will, in truth, strengthen the leisure trade. It’ll definitely strengthen the Web-bo library: Mixing the titles owned by these two corporations will imply an enormous enhance in Netflix’s assortment of older films and sequence, one thing its personal catalog has at all times lacked with out the help of licensing offers.
But that seems like solely a small profit, in comparison with the continued contraction of the trade this deal represents, which finally seems like it can result in fewer alternatives for nice tales to be informed. And by the point we discover out for positive… It’ll be too late to do something about it.
