Please be aware: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identification.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are continuously underneath fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re very important sources on every thing from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial range. The type of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and 0 accountability. If that seems like a battle on girls, nicely… you’re not fallacious.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to struggle again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t should learn about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Provided Well being Information is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA have been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is crucial to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of very important public well being data on subjects corresponding to HIV and sexually transmitted ailments, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face important challenges in making knowledgeable choices about therapy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Luckily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it obtainable to the general public5. This text incorporates an inventory of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one get together to a different mustn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming pattern highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Function of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Ladies’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being by coverage, training, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a important step in making certain that ailments, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more important.
Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Assets
Under is a curated checklist of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of ladies of their reproductive years, in the course of the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to very important well being information and be sure that all girls have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Undertaking
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Presents free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person training supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American School of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively function of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and training. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality companies and is the biggest supplier of intercourse training within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Presents rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Ladies
Centered on girls aged 35 to 64, this group gives medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome growing old and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Basic Hospital Heart for Ladies’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Data Heart
Presents reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life levels, with specialised help for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.
Heart for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply vital—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that help knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the onerous work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t price combating for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says
Chinese (Simplified)
English
French
Japanese
Russian
Spanish