Spencer Elden, who was photographed because the bare child on the quilt of Nirvana’s 1991 Nevermind album, is just not backing down from pursuing authorized motion towards the band. Following a decide’s second dismissal of Elden’s baby pornography lawsuit earlier this week, his legal professionals have as soon as once more filed an attraction.
To recap, Elden, who’s now in his 30s, sued Nirvana and other parties for child exploitation again in 2021, claiming the picture of him amounted to baby pornography, and that his authorized guardians by no means granted consent for the band to make use of the picture as its album cowl. Decide Fernando M. Olguin tossed the lawsuit in 2022 primarily based on the statute of limitations, but it surely was revived by an appeals court. Earlier this week, Olguin dismissed the suit again, figuring out that the picture is “not baby pornography.”
On Thursday, simply two days after Decide Olguin’s newest ruling. Elden’s attorneys filed a brand new attraction to reinstate the lawsuit as soon as once more. The legal professionals are asking the Ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals to overturn Olguin’s judgment and permit a trial to happen.
Associated Video
In a press release to Billboard, Bert Deixler, an legal professional representing Nirvana, Common Music Group, and Nevermind photographer Kirk Weddle, insisted, “We are going to resist with vigor and can prevail.”
As a part of his ruling dismissing the lawsuit on Tuesday, Decide Olguin reasoned, “Neither the pose, point of interest, setting, nor total context counsel the album cowl options sexually specific conduct. This picture — a picture that’s most analogous to a household picture of a nude baby bathing — is plainly inadequate to help a discovering of [child pornography].”
The decide additionally identified that Elden has profited from the picture by autographing memorabilia and calling himself the “Nirvana child.”
