The Seoul Excessive Courtroom has denied the NewJeans members’ enchantment and upheld the original decision barring them from partaking in impartial actions.
Again in March, the Seoul Central District Courtroom granted ADOR’s request for an injunction prohibiting the NewJeans members from finishing up impartial leisure actions, akin to signing commercial contracts with out ADOR’s data or approval.
On the time, the NewJeans members appealed the ruling by a proper objection, however in April, the Seoul Central District Courtroom denied their objection and reaffirmed the validity of the injunction. The NewJeans members then instantly appealed the injunction determination to the Seoul Excessive Courtroom.
Nevertheless, on June 17, the Seoul Excessive Courtroom finally rejected the enchantment, upholding the preliminary determination prohibiting the NewJeans members from finishing up impartial actions with out ADOR’s involvement.
Supply (1)
