Director Peter Pasyk will direct the Soulpepper Theatre manufacturing of Harold Pinter’s Old Times, with previews starting August 6, and opening night time set for August 13. The manufacturing will proceed till September 7 as an early opening to the autumn season.
Pinter’s play is one in every of his lesser recognized titles on this aspect of the Atlantic. It units up a state of affairs that’s stuffed with potential: a married couple welcome one of many spouse’s previous buddies for a go to.
Because the go to progresses, tales in regards to the previous emerge and are disputed, and reminiscence itself turns into suspect. What did or didn’t happen so a few years in the past? What does it imply to the current?
Pinter withholds certainty, leaving the ending ambiguous and open to interpretation.
Ludwig-Van talked to Pasyk in regards to the manufacturing.
Director Peter Pasyk
Peter Pasyk has labored with a few of Canada’s main theatre firms, together with the Stratford Competition, the place he directed the flagship manufacturing of Hamlet in 2022, Royal Manitoba Theatre Centre, Tarragon Theatre, Soulpepper, and Canadian Stage. He’s led a number of world première productions, together with Jordan Tannahill’s Late Firm (Theatre Centre), and was nominated for Dora Awards a number of others, together with for The Nether, Killer Joe, Dying Metropolis, When the World Was Inexperienced and The Jones Boy.
Peter can also be a filmmaker, who co-wrote Planeta Singli (Planet Single), one in every of Poland’s highest grossing function movies, and he not too long ago directed the pilot of a brand new Polish comedy TV sequence.
On stage, he directed The Seafarer starring Paul Gross at Alberta Theatre Initiatives in late 2024. His award-winning quick movie The Understudy (theunderstudyfilm.com) has screened at movie festivals around the globe.

Peter Pasyk: The Interview
The selection to direct Pinter at Soulpepper was a straightforward one.
“It’s thought-about a contemporary traditional,” Pasyk says of the play. “And, Soulpepper is an organization can also be constructed on presenting trendy classics. That’s the roots of the corporate. I used to be honoured to be requested,” he provides.
Pinter’s performs ask large questions whose significance doesn’t diminish with time or place. “Classics are thought-about so for a cause. There’s one thing enduring about them that hold us curious to see them.”
As he factors out, most performs which might be produced don’t final past their first season.
“This play has a timelessness as a result of it asks large questions on what it’s to be human, and the character of reminiscence, and id, and love.”
Definitely, the character of fact in our society is a query that many people grapple with nowadays.
“Notably with this play, I believe that all through Pinter’s work, I believe that he’s at all times been investigating the character of fact, and maybe posing that it’s subjective,” Pasyk says.
Everybody’s view comes from their very own particular person expertise, as he factors out. Reality is dependent upon who sees it, and what they’ve lived by.
He mentions Pinter’s Nobel Lecture, delivered in 2005 and titled “Artwork, Reality & Politics”, which the playwright used to criticize American international coverage, and the way fact is manipulated in each politics and artwork.
“When he gained the Nobel Prize, he gave a well-known speech, [and he said] in my performs, I discover the character of fact, and there’s no finite fact — however relating to politics, there are,” Pasyk says.
It was undeniably a politically minded speech. “However his politics actually aren’t mirrored in his performs. They’re about one thing extra elementary.”
Minimalism on Stage
“It’s a minimalist manufacturing,” Pasyk explains, “and that’s actually dictated by the minimalist nature — the important high quality of Pinter’s writing.”
There are not any wasted traces, superfluous or self-indulgent diversions away from the central plot and premise. “There’s no wastage,” he says. “We’ve taken that as a cue.”
There’s nothing to distract the viewers from what’s going down on stage.
“The play is a puzzle, a thriller,” Pasyk says. “It asks plenty of questions, it begs plenty of questions of the viewers.”
Alongside the best way, it engages with the viewers’s creativeness and sense of inquisitiveness. “There’s an ambiguity that’s baked into the premise of the piece that’s necessary for me to protect.”
He was cautious to not impose his personal interpretation of the story on the manufacturing.
“That’s what I like about Pinter — he trusts the viewers.”
The blanks can solely be stuffed by the viewers.
“Argue together with your fiends on the best way residence on what the reality of the matter is,” Peter says. “The play is about contested truths.”
The Nature of Reminiscence
The couple within the story of the play have been married for 20 years. That’s plenty of time for recollections to percolate and alter. The arrival of the spouse’s previous good friend places all of that to the take a look at.
“There [are] plenty of discrepancies in every of their recollections of the previous,” Pasyk explains. “In some methods, it’s a thriller. It’s a psychosexual thriller.”
However, audiences must also anticipate a thread of humour to run by the story.
“He’s additionally — Pinter’s additionally very humorous. He has a wry, sharp — a darkish sense of humour.”
The turmoil is psychological. That’s why in depth units aren’t wanted for his tales. “All of Pinter’s play are set in a room. He didn’t write performs with expansive areas,” Peter notes. “He was inquisitive about individuals in a room.”
Pinter usually makes use of the arrival of an outsider or intruder to upset the stability of that room. “He was within the human want for marking one’s territory,” Pasyk explains. “There’s a form of territorial contest.”
Whose model of the reality will prevail?
“It jogs my memory of that saying, historical past is written by the winner.”
Reminiscence is a form of story we tells ourselves. In actual fact, we’re recalling a reminiscence of a reminiscence, and every time we do, Pasyk likens it to a form of damaged cellphone train, or a photocopy of a photocopy, the place every iteration is an increasing number of ambiguous.
“We play with our personal previous.”
Psychological Complexity on Stage
Pasyk refers to an oft-quoted passage of Pinter’s about speech.
“The speech we hear is a sign of that which we don’t hear. It’s a mandatory avoidance, a violent, sly, and anguished or mocking smoke display screen which retains the opposite in its true place. When true silence falls we’re left with echo however are nearer nakedness. A method of speech is to say that it’s a fixed stratagem to cowl nakedness.”
“There’s one thing about Pinter’s work,” Pasyk says. “Not one of the characters make plain their true motives, and that’s a part of the thriller.”
The way to convey that form of thought with actors on stage?
“There’s a lot work we do in rehearsals with the subtext,” Pasyk says. It’s about discovering the premise for what’s not said, for the interior workings of the characters.
“Communication may be an uncomfortable factor. We use phrases to make ourselves sound erudite,” he notes. On the identical time, we regularly use speech to cover feelings like worry and self consciousness.
“There’s at all times one thing occurring beneath.”
Pinter was a grasp at depicting what isn’t stated or spoken out loud.
“The joys of rehearsal is making these discoveries and constructing that as they go,” he says. “It’s actually a masterpiece, a extremely gorgeous play.”
Remaining Ideas
Whereas Previous Instances is usually produced all through the UK, it’s hardly ever seen on stage in Canada, Pasyk factors out.
“It’s a uncommon alternative,” he notes.
- Discover tickets and different present particulars [HERE].
Are you trying to promote an event? Have a news tip? Have to know the very best events occurring this weekend? Ship us a note.
#LUDWIGVAN
Get the every day arts information straight to your inbox.
